Mass Surveillance of Americans is Immune From Judicial Review

A federal judge has dismissed, a case from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) on behalf of AT&T customers challenging the National Security Agency’s mass surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans’ phone calls and emails.

“We’re deeply disappointed in the judge’s ruling,” said EFF Legal Director Cindy Cohn. “This ruling robs innocent telecom customers of their privacy rights without due process of law.”

In the ruling, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Vaughn Walker held that the privacy harm to millions of Americans from the illegal spying dragnet was not a “particularized injury” but instead a “generalized grievance” because almost everyone in the United States has a phone and Internet service.

“The alarming upshot of the court’s decision is that so long as the government spies on all Americans, the courts have no power to review or halt such mass surveillance even when it is flatly illegal and unconstitutional,” said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston. “With new revelations of illegal spying being reported practically every other week — just this week, we learned that the FBI has been unlawfully obtaining Americans’ phone records using Post-It notes rather than proper legal process — the need for judicial oversight when it comes to government surveillance has never been clearer.”

EFF Plans Appeal of Jewel v. NSA Warrantless Wiretapping Case (Electronic Frontier Foundation)


  • » Judge Rules Traffic cameras “A Scam” Against Motorists.
  • » Cameras Mounted On Cop Cars Scan 10,000 License Plates Per Hour
  • » Obama Supports DNA Upon Arrest
  • » German Officials Launch Legal Action Against Facebook
  • » Miami-Dade Police To Get Unmanned Drone
  • One Response to “Mass Surveillance of Americans is Immune From Judicial Review”

    1. Paul the Cab Driver Says:

      Well what do you expect? The same government that does the spying hires the judges!

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.